How I Write

writing processRecently on Chuck Wendig’s blog, he was talking about the nuts and bolts of his writing process. I posted a comment about my own process, but thought I would expand on it a bit.

First off, because I write at work as well as at home, I don’t have a daily timeframe in which I always write. What I’m working on in a particular day changes too frequently to fall into a process, and writing at home is often when I have some spare time and the energy to do it. As a result, my writing timetable is more about daily time management rather than something like “I get up at 5am and write for three hours.” That being said, I do try to write something meaningful every day, and I tend to write before noon on weekends, and between noon and early evening on weekdays.

I tend to write first drafts in plain text. For a while I just used Notepad in Windows, but I’ve recently been a convert to WriteMonkey. It doesn’t have easy text formatting tools or spell check (which is good, because that tends to be what I fiddle with when writing first drafts), but there are useful features like real time wordcount and a progress bar that keep me going back to it. Basically, it gets the hell out of the way and lets me write my ugly first draft without judging me. Even better, I can install it on my Dropbox, so I always have it on any computer I have my Dropbox hooked up to.

A quick side note: I know a lot of writers like programs like WriteMonkey because they are “distraction-free.” I’ve also heard stories of writers who turn of their Internet connection or shut down certain pieces of software while they’re writing. I don’t do that – the only concession I’ll make to the Internet when I’m writing is that I’ll switch my Google Talk to “Do Not Disturb.” When writing in the office, I can’t really block out email or IM, especially because our IM client (Communicator) also doubles as our office telephone system. But in general, I tend to work in short sprints of 10-15 minutes, instead of trying to run a marathon of several hours. Sure, sometimes I get into the groove and I’ll write until I stop, but more often than not taking two minutes to answer a quick work email will recharge me enough to start my next 10 minute sprint.

Second and subsequent drafts used to be done in Word 2010 at work and OpenOffice 3 for home, but over the past few months I’ve run into enough formatting problems trying to switch documents between the software suites that I went ahead and put Word 2010 on my personal laptop as well. I used to just copy and paste the text from WriteMonkey into Word, but recently I’ve been playing with the textile markup export. Between that and Word 2010 styles, I can go right from boring text to a look that is closer to what I want, so I can jump right into revision instead of (again) fucking around with formatting.

I do subsequent drafts in Word until I’m ready to call something final. Then I usually print it out, or export it to a new program to look at it one more time, because changing the context can often cause thing to jump out at me that I didn’t see before.

Blog posts like this one are generally written in Windows Live Writer 2011, because blogs are pretty much one-draft writing. The exceptions are my Tour de Holmes essays, which go through the usual WriteMonkey/Word process, because those require more research and crafting.

All of my writing (both work and personal) is saved to Dropbox. Not only does it mean I always have access to everything I’ve written, but Dropbox does save old versions of files, so if I really screw up (which I’ve done a couple of times), it’s easy for me to go back in time and get that draft I thoughtlessly deleted.1 One side benefit is that I can also pull my drafts on my phone, which has been useful when I get a spontaneous idea or when asked about a particular point of a project in progress.

I’ve been trying out the Scrivener beta, and I’m already in love with its organizational options. It might replace WriteMonkey for longer projects like Whitechapel and Marvelous Superheroes, but thus far I haven’t done too much with it – I’ve tried out too many betas to trust a project I care about to them. But once it’s out of beta, I’ll likely drop the $40 and start moving some projects into it.

What’s your process like?

  1. I’m ruthless in deleting old drafts. Unless there’s a strong reason for me to keep an old draft, I’ll delete it rather than letting it clog up my hard drive, and I’ll often delete old drafts once a project is done.

The Five Orange Pips (1891)

The Five Orange Pips

The Five Orange Pips

Want to read this along with me? This essay is part of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, published in 1892. I used the epub version found on Feedbooks.com.

Now we move on to a story where Holmes matches wits with the KKK (yes, that KKK), and as a result, nothing really gets resolved. While this case is lacking in resolution, it provides some more key points that helps (and hinders) continuity.

For example, Watson makes a reference that he has been chronicling cases from 1882 to 1890, which heavily implies that A Study in Scarlet takes place around 1882. However, this case is set on September 1887 even though he claims he is still married (as well as containing a vague reference to Irene Adler). Since Watson appears to be reminiscing here, it’s possible that he got the date wrong, but it was only four years ago, so I’m more inclined to believe that this case is later than 1887.

In this story we also start getting specific details on the so-called “apocryphal cases,” cases that Watson mentions in passing but are never written by Doyle himself. These little references have provided a lot of pastiche fodder over the decades (with mixed results), and we’ll likely see more and more versions of these apocryphal cases by various authors for years to come.

More telling, though, is the fact that this story twice mentions multiple defeats of Holmes prior to 1890:

Some, too, have baffled his analytical skill, and would be, as narratives, beginnings without an ending…

and

“I have been beaten four times – three times by men, and once by a woman.”

It helps to sell this particular unresolved case, and has the additional whiff of authenticity – even the famous Sherlock Holmes can, and has, been beaten and stymied.

There’s also a great exchange that tells another small detail about the relationship between Holmes and Watson:

“Why,” said I, glancing up at my companion, “that was surely the bell. Who could come to-night? Some friend of yours, perhaps?”

“Except yourself I have none,” he answered.

We also see this detail:

We sat in silence for some minutes, Holmes more depressed and shaken than I had ever seen him.

This, combined with the fact that his vengeance against his fallen client contains a fair bit of bruised ego, and Holmes is certainly a far cry from the emotionless machine he claimed to be!

We get more solid deductions from Watson about seaports and Texas, another appearance by the nameless maid, and the third story in a row where Holmes takes justice into his own hands. All signs point to this being a classic Holmes story.

And yet, that’s not the case. Holmes’ investigation ends up being a monologue, and the story just ends. Doyle tries to force a resolution by the implication of the loss of the Lone Star, but in reality Holmes gets too cocky, his client dies, and he gets nowhere in putting his hands on the culprits. We have yet another bloodthirsty American secret society who mysteriously has connections and reach into the heart of London. Maybe it’s because of the similarities to the Mormons in Scarlet, or maybe because the KKK has such a strong impact on American culture in the 20th century, but I find it hard to get past the inclusion of the KKK in this story (even if the current KKK is actually a completely different organization founded in 1915). This story is an interesting attempt to try something new with the Holmes formula, but in my opinion it ends up being one of the weaker short stories.

Yanking Out The Wires In The Time Bomb

My mother’s family, the Sweeneys, have been my “main” family for most of my life. Between being told that my grandmother on the Webb side disowned me and generally not feeling a part of any of my step-parents’ families,1 the Sweeneys have always been the family I’ve been around the most, the ones who helped me to accept my Irish heritage (even when I didn’t), and the family that frequently encouraged my creative side.

The Sweeneys are also riddled with chronic depression.

My mom, thank god, seems to have been largely untouched. My aunt ended up addicted to a variety of drugs and ran away from her husband and family. She and my uncles were also alcoholics. One of my uncles has tried repeatedly to commit suicide. The other one succeeded. I have heard legendary stories of my grandmother’s mood swings, even though she was always polite and tender toward me. One of my cousins has been in and out of jail a couple of times, and that’s only what I know from our childhood and young adult life. The “melancholic drunk Irish artist” stereotype isn’t so quaint or amusing when you’re looking at it over the course of your life.

Continue reading

  1. To their credit, the Maruna family did try, but they’ve pretty much cut off ties with us since my step-father died

The Boscombe Valley Mystery (1891)

The Boscombe Valley Mystery

The Boscombe Valley Mystery

Want to read this along with me? This essay is part of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, published in 1892. I used the epub version found on Feedbooks.com.

In all of the previous stories, Holmes gravitated to various key unusual details which helped him to solve the case. In “The Boscombe Valley Mystery,” however, the case appears to be relatively straightforward to everyone except Holmes. It’s also the first case which doesn’t start in 221B Baker Street, and in which Holmes and Watson leave London entirely. But Lestrade comes back, and Holmes mentions his monograph on ash again, just in case you were thinking this was a story in which everything is new.

For some reason, I always confuse this story with The Hound of the Baskervilles. There are certainly a lot of common elements (such as the train ride, a period of separation between Watson and Holmes, and a murder in a remote part of England), but the stories are actually pretty distinct once you get into both of them. Still, if you’ve read this story with a sense of deja vu, you’re not the only one.

Continue reading

A Visit to Gamma Terra

Earlier this year, I tried out Mutant Future with some friends at work. There were a lot of reasons why I gave it a whirl, but one of them was certainly that I’ve always had a fondness for merging the style of fantasy adventure that D&D does well with real-world locations and sci-fi elements. However, as I mentioned in my Mutant Future posts, I wasn’t in love with the system. Over the past year or so I’ve become quite the D&D 4e convert, so when I heard that Wizards of the Coast would be releasing Gamma World using the 4e system, I was happy to snap up the boxed set when I saw it in a local bookstore.

One of the reasons why I was interested in Gamma World was that the D&D game my wife Michelle runs sometimes has problems getting all the players together, and I thought it would be nice to have a “pick-up” game to run on the off weeks where we can’t get the band together for dungeon-crawling. Since both games use a very similar engine, there aren’t a whole lot of new rules to learn, and the random character creation makes it even easier to just get some people together and go. Still, I was surprised that things went from “Hey, guys, would you be interested in this?” to “Can we play next weekend?” Anyhow, I ran the game earlier today, and it was a hell of a lot of fun. In four hours we had characters made, a backstory cobbled together, and got through three combat encounters. Here are some of my thoughts:

Continue reading

A Case of Identity (1891)

a case of identity (1891)

a case of identity (1891)

Want to read this along with me? This essay is part of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, published in 1892. I used the epub version found on Feedbooks.com.

Like “A Study in Scarlet,” this is a case in which no actual crime has been committed, but there’s a lot more going on under the surface.

This case starts with the first of many jumps backwards in continuity. The client in this case is Miss Mary Sutherland, who was mentioned in the previous story, “The Red-Headed League”, and the reference to the gift from the King of Bohemia implies it takes place after “A Scandal in Bohemia.” However, you will note that, for the first time, Watson doesn’t excuse himself from listening to the client’s woes. I’m inclined to think that Watson is more likely to remain present when a woman’s honor is challenged, but it could just as easily be chalked up to another continuity error.

Continue reading

The Red-Headed League (1891)

The Red-Headed League (1891)

The Red-Headed League (1891)

Want to read this along with me? This essay is part of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, published in 1892. I used the epub version found on Feedbooks.com.

We move on to another favorite story of Doyle’s, “The Red-Headed League.” I always found this story to be a touch overcomplicated – not in the delivery, but in the means by which the perpetrators go about their crime. On the other hand, it is a look at a con game enacted in the Victorian era, as well as the introduction (and subsequent arrest) of an intelligent thief, the “fourth-smartest man in London.”1 It’s a good example of a Sherlock Holmes story that doesn’t involve a murder, and for that I think it makes a good read, even if I’m waffling on whether I would include it in my personal top ten.

Continue reading

  1. As an individual, and based on pure audacity and long-term planning, I’d probably put John Clay on the level of Arsene Lupin. And if you don’t know who Arsene Lupin is, that’s a whole different series of essays…